Skip to:

  1. Skip to Jira Navigation
  2. Skip to Side Navigation
  3. Skip to Main Content

Dual-license sphgeom

Description

This was meant to happen in but I forgot to do include sphgeom. It clearly makes no sense for sphgeom to be GPLv3 when daf_butler is BSD.

Issue Matrix

hide

Activity

Show:

William O'Mullane 
January 8, 2024 at 11:56 PM

Yes I formally approve making sphgeom dual license also. No need for another RFC.

Tim Jenness 
January 8, 2024 at 11:10 PM

you reviewed and this is more of the same.

given that this was implied by but not explicit in I'd like you to formally approve these changes. daf_butler isn't really allowed to be BSD license if sphgeom is GPL and I forgot to mention sphgeom in the original RFC. If you would prefer a new RFC please also state that here.

Done
Pinned fields
Click on the next to a field label to start pinning.

Details

Assignee

Reporter

Labels

Reviewers

Kian-Tat Lim
William O'Mullane

Story Points

RubinTeam

Components

Checklist

Created January 8, 2024 at 10:01 PM
Updated January 9, 2024 at 9:56 PM
Resolved January 9, 2024 at 9:56 PM